Represented the real estate holding in regulatory litigation

Our lawyers argued against the claim and pleaded with the real estate holding’s position that all required formalities for the purchase of buildings had been done and the contractual obligations had been implemented conscientiously.

As partner Ramūnas Audzevičius emphasized: “This case because of its complexity and specific issues related to the public interest and the rights of the Prosecutor’s office to defend it has a significant influence on the practice of Lithuanian Courts. It shows the willingness of the court to extend the doctrine of res judicata in cases when the public interest was defended not only by the concrete institution, which defends it (Ministry of Finance and Prosecutor’s office) but to the state as a whole, where institutions defending the public interest, although legally separate, are both state institutions.”