Defended the creditor from the debtor’s abuse of the institute of interim measures

The debtor of our client (the creditor) filed an appeal to the court against the bailiff’s actions, requesting the termination of the recovery proceedings. The debtor argued that his obligation to the creditor allegedly ended with the application of a counter-set-off. The debtor also requested for interim measures and the suspension of the recovery proceedings.

Our Dispute Resolution team convinced both the court of the first instance and the appellate court that the suspension of recovery proceedings was an exceptional measure, whereas the debtor had not proved any of the conditions for the application of the interim measures requested. Moreover, the courts agreed with our argument that the dismissal of a similar appeal against the bailiff’s actions suggests that the appeal cannot be considered preliminarily (lot. prima facie) substantiated.

Message was sent successfully

Send a message

    Submit
    Business law firm in Lithuania - Motieka
    Cookie Settings

    We use cookies to improve your experience and the performance of our site, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic.

    Cookies are small textual files containing identifier that are sent by a web server to your web browser and are stored by the browser. The identifier is then sent back to the server each time the browser requests a page from the server.

    Cookies do not typically contain any information that personally identifies a user, but personal information that we store about you may be linked to the information stored in and obtained from cookies.